A Comprehensive Anti-piracy Strategy

In January 2015, CIMSEC announced a High School Scholarship Essay Contest. This article by Griffin Cannon won the second prize in the contest. Cannon is a senior at the Vermont Commons School in South Burlington, Vermont. As a graduating senior he plans on attending university at the U.S. Naval Academy or on a NROTC scholarship. Griffin hopes to pursue a career in either engineering or defense policy after serving in the Navy.

Belgian SOC Pathfinders on the Belgian frigate Louise Marie during its anti-piracy mission off Somalia. March, 2015.

Belgian SOC Pathfinders on the Belgian frigate Louise Marie during its anti-piracy mission off Somalia. March, 2015.

Piracy has been a threat to the safety of the seas since the seas were first used for transport and it has been a danger ever since. From the Barbary Corsairs to the privateers of the Caribbean, pirates have found ways to succeed or even thrive no matter the situation. For years pirate skiffs from Somalia have been attacking marine traffic to hold the ships and/or their crews for ransom. These brazen attacks have drawn the attention of the media and even, in the case of the MV Maersk Alabama, Hollywood. Of course any security issue that comes to the attention of the general public has first passed through the halls of numerous defense ministries across the globe so it should come as no surprise that before, during, and after these events, efforts were made by various navies including the US Navy and a coalition task force from the European Union to combat this growing problem. In this essay I would like to address what they have done and how it could be done better and in a more sustainable manner.

The primary approach was taken thus far is to use large surface combatants such as frigates and destroyers as escorts for merchant ships as well as touring African nations and training their respective navies in counter-piracy operations. These measures, when combined with better safety measures taken by commercial vessels, have been extremely effective since 2012 and attacks off Somalia have become almost vanishingly rare at this point in time (“(U) Horn of Africa / Gulf of Guinea / Southeast Asia: Piracy Analysis and Warning Weekly (PAWW) Report for 8 – 14 January 2015“, US Office of Naval Intelligence, 2). This being said, these measures are fairly expensive both in money and in combat forces and while the threat off the Horn of Africa has been put into remission temporarily, the underlying issues that lead to the growth of piracy in the region remain (Jon Gornall, “Somali Piracy Threat Always on the Horizon“, The National, 16.12.2014). Thus if the governments responsible for this crackdown on piracy wish to continue to suppress piracy without devoting significant monetary resources and a handful of large surface combatants to the region a change in strategy is required.

The 18th escort taskforce of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and the US Navy guided missile destroyer USS Sterett (DDG-104) conduct a China-U.S. joint maritime anti-piracy drill in the waters of the Gulf of Aden on Dec. 11, 2014. (Photo: Sun Haichao).

The 18th escort taskforce of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) and the US Navy guided missile destroyer USS Sterett (DDG-104) conduct a China-U.S. joint maritime anti-piracy drill in the waters of the Gulf of Aden on Dec. 11, 2014. (Photo: Sun Haichao).

Currently the platforms responsible for this mission are surface combatants and Maritime Patrol and Reconnaissance Aircraft (MPRAs). These platforms belong to three multinational forces and four single state task forces are deployed in the region (PLAN, JMSDF, Russian Navy, CTF 151, NATO TF 508 and EUNAVFOR). This is overkill. While the current system has worked, it is large and inefficient and when the political will runs out, this bureaucratic nightmare will be one of the first things to go. Thus there is a need for immediate change.

First of all, the platforms now being used for security operations are not ideal for the job. The P-3 Orion and other manned MPRAs used for wide area maritime surveillance in the area are high value assets in the navies of their respective countries and can be used for missions as diverse anti-submarine to search and rescue missions. In contrast, the MQ-4C Triton Unmanned Aerial System was designed without the anti-surface and anti-sub capabilities of most MPRAs and focused instead on long endurance patrol of large bodies of water. With an acquisition cost only 68% of the P-8A (the US Navy’s current MPRA; US Government Accountability Office, “Defense Acquisitions: Assessment of Selected Weapon Programs“, March 2013, p. 109, 115) along with lower operational costs, the Triton is the clear choice for maritime patrol in low threat environments such as the coast of Somalia.

As for surface combatants, the frigates and destroyers currently allocated for these missions are large and often significantly over-armed for confrontations with pirates in small motorboats. An alternative would be smaller platforms, both manned and unmanned, which could provide sufficient armament and speed to effectively combat the threat while requiring significantly less time, money, and logistical support.

The manned platforms suited to this task that are available for use today are the Cyclone patrol ships, eight of which are currently forward based in the Persian Gulf, the MK VI Patrol Boat, and the MK V Special Operations craft. These craft could be used as a rapid response force, responding to threats at speeds of between 35 knots (the Cyclone) and 50 knots (the MK V) with Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance support from Triton UASs in the area. Of course these platforms unfortunately lack the persistence afforded by larger displacement surface combatants, which is where the Unmanned Surface Vehicle (USV) comes in. While the manned platforms listed above are an ideal and sufficient force to deal with crises such as the successful hijacking of a ship, they lack the ability to stay on station in the shipping lanes for long durations. Having these vessels in position to intercept any threats detected by airborne search radar is essential to prevent hijackings before they happen. The US Navy as well as a number of others have invested in the development of USVs primarily to protect large combatants from swarms of small, hostile boats armed with short range anti-ship missiles. Unfortunately the USVs currently in inventory are not armed but models in the near future will be.

Textron Common Unmanned Surface Vehicle. In fall 2014, Textron Systems has won a $33.8 million US Navy contract for the production of the CUSV. It will to be used as the carrier platform for the Unmanned Influence Sweep System (UISS) as part of the LCS’ Mine Countermeasure (MCM) mission package. The first increment of the MCM package — designed to find and neutralize less complex but more plentiful contact mines — is slated to be tested onboard USS Independence (LCS-2) this year.

Textron Common Unmanned Surface Vehicle. In fall 2014, Textron Systems has won a $33.8 million US Navy contract for the production of the CUSV. It will to be used as the carrier platform for the Unmanned Influence Sweep System (UISS) as part of the LCS’ Mine Countermeasure (MCM) mission package. The first increment of the MCM package — designed to find and neutralize less complex but more plentiful contact mines — is slated to be tested onboard USS Independence (LCS-2) this year.

With all these niches filled, a comprehensive anti-piracy strategy begins to emerge. First, a small, manned contingency response group, based in the gulf and rotated through ports of friendly nations will be constantly in the area to safeguard against crises. Second, the unmanned surface element will patrol threatened areas regularly to defend shipping against small-scale attacks and will be constantly on station, ready to intercept threats if and when directed to do so. Finally, the Triton element will provide a persistent “eye in the sky” for surface elements.

Piracy is an issue, both off the Horn of Africa and around the world but as we have seen in the past few years it can be beaten. I believe that with a force such as the one described here, navies around the world could use the advantages of new technology to fight this age old threat.

This entry was posted in Drones, English, International, Piracy, Sea Powers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *